With the recent release of Safari 3.1 the WebKit team has completely reworked the handling of key events. John Resig has an interesting blog article with some details. Safari 3.1 now behaves pretty much like Internet Explorer and is in general much more sane than before. For instance, all those strange key codes larger than 64000 for special keys are gone and finally modifier keys like "shift" and "control" fire key events as well. Interestingly, Safari is now the first browser to support the key identifier property defined in the DOM level 3 event specification. In qooxdoo we already emulate this property in key events for quite some time now, and it really helps to simplify key handler code in our widgets.

Unfortunately, this change in Safari 3.1 broke the existing qooxdoo key event handler. But it is already fixed and available in our subversion repository for legacy_0_7_x branch and trunk. The fix was basically to detect the current WebKit version and use the existing Internet Explorer key handler code also for Safari 3.1 and above. Since all browser quirks are handled separately this was a pretty simple fix. Of course, it will be part of the next minor release 0.7.4 as well as the final 0.8. If you need Safari 3.1 support now, please checkout the latest version from the legacy_0_7_x branch.

In qooxdoo 0.8 we will introduce the concept of widget decorators. This has already been described in an earlier blog article. Decorators allow a widget's background to be styled independent of the widget's content. To demonstrate the flexibility of the decorator concept I have written a decorator, which uses native CSS rounded borders in Firefox and Safari/Webkit and emulates the same behavior in Internet Explorer. The screenshot shows the same qooxdoo 0.8 application in Internet Explorer 7, Firefox 3 Beta 3, WebKit r30082 and Firefox 2.0.11.

The widget shown in the screen shots is generated by the following snippet of qooxdoo code:

 
doc = new qx.ui.root.Application(document);
 
var border = new qx.ui.decoration.RoundedBorder().set({
  radius: [10, 20, 30, 40],
  width: [3, 10, 20, 5],
  color: ["red", "green", "yellow", "blue"],
  backgroundColor: "gray"
});
 
doc.add(new qx.ui.basic.Label().set({
  html: qx.bom.client.Engine.NAME,
  decorator : border,
  width: 140,
  height: 100,
  padding: 20
}), 10, 10);

I think the most interesting question is about the IE implementation. Since IE has no native CSS rounded border support, the borders must be rendered using a different technique. A common approach is to render the borders using pixel-sized DIV elements like e.g. RUZEE.Borders does. We have used a different and in my opinion much more powerful approach.

We use VML to render the background including the border. The VML code is dynamically created and inserted into the decoration DIV using plain innerHTML. Since the decorator is informed about size changes by the qooxdoo layout engine, it can update its borders accordingly. The rendering quality is amazing and looks pretty much like the best native browser implementation of Firefox 3. This is the code automatically generated and applied by qooxdoo:

 
<style>v\: * { behavior:url(#default#VML);display:inline-block }</style>
 
<xml:namespace ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" prefix="v" />
<div style="left: 10px; width: 140px; position: absolute; top: 10px; height: 100px">
<div style="z-index: 10; left: 25px; width: 85px; position: relative; top: 23px; height: 37px" usehtml="true">mshtml</div>
<div style="z-index: 5; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px">
    <v:group style="left: 0px; width: 140px; position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 100px; antialias: true" coordsize = "140,100">
    <v:shape style="width: 140px; height: 100px" coordsize = "140,100" fillcolor = "gray" path = " m10,1 ns l120,1 qx139,20 l139,70 qy110,99 l40,99 qx1,60 l1,10 qy10,1 x e"></v:shape>
    <v:shape style="width: 140px; height: 100px" coordsize = "140,100" fillcolor = "red" path = " m10,3 ns at5,3,15,13,10,3,5,3 wa0,0,20,20,0,0,10,0 wa100,0,140,40,120,0,140,0 at110,3,130,23,130,3,120,3 x e"></v:shape>
    <v:shape style="width: 140px; height: 100px" coordsize = "140,100" fillcolor = "green" path = " m130,13 ns at110,3,130,23,130,13,130,3 wa100,0,140,40,140,0,140,20 wa80,40,140,100,140,70,140,100 at110,60,130,80,130,80,130,70 x e"></v:shape>
    <v:shape style="width: 140px; height: 100px" coordsize = "140,100" fillcolor = "yellow" path = " m120,80 ns at110,60,130,80,120,80,130,80 wa80,40,140,100,140,100,110,100 wa0,20,80,100,40,100,0,100 at5,40,45,80,5,80,25,80 x e"></v:shape>
    <v:shape style="width: 140px; height: 100px" coordsize = "140,100" fillcolor = "blue" path = " m5,60 ns at5,40,45,80,5,60,5,80 wa0,20,80,100,0,100,0,60 wa0,0,20,20,0,10,0,0 at5,3,15,13,5,3,5,8 x e"></v:shape>
    </v:group>
  </div>
</div>
 

Generated HTML for Internet Explorer

The first two lines are required to enable VML support and are only added once into a page. Note that only one of the DIV elements contains VML code. The rest is typical HTML code generated by the qooxdoo GUI toolkit, which does all the layouting itself, just using JavaScript. It consists of a couple of nested, absolutely positioned DIV elements with the appropriate CSS styles applied.

The code for Firefox is much simpler and just sets the browser-specific CSS styles:

 
<div style="position: absolute; z-index: 0; left: 10px; top: 10px; width: 140px; height: 100px;">
<div style="position: relative; z-index: 10; left: 25px; top: 23px; width: 85px; height: 37px;">gecko</div>
<div style="border-style: solid; border-color: red green yellow blue; border-width: 3px 10px 20px 5px; z-index: 5; position: absolute; left: 0pt; top: 0pt; -moz-box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%; height: 100%; background-color: gray; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 30px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 40px;"></div>
</div>
 

Generated HTML for Firefox

Native browser support

The quality of rounded border implementations differ a lot between browsers. The CSS3 draft defines the property border-radius and a property for each corner like border-top-left-radius. These properties take two values, one for the horizontal radius and one for the vertical radius. That way it is possible to define (quarter-)elliptical borders. If only a single value is given, the border is (quarter-)circular.

Current browser implementations

• Firefox 2: Firefox supports only circular borders. Border definitions always take a single parameter - the radius. The CSS property is called -moz-border-radius and -moz-border-radius-topleft, respectively. -moz-border-radius supports the CSS shorthand mode. If only one parameter is given, the radius of all four border is identical. If four parameters are defined, the radius for all four corners is set individually. The rendering quality is very poor since Firefox 2 does not use anti-aliasing to render the border (cf. screen shot).
• Firefox 3: The same as Firefox 2 but borders are rendered using anti-aliasing, which looks much better (thanks to the Cairo 2D graphics library).
• Safari/WebKit: The CSS property names differ from the W3C spec (-webkit-border-radius and -webkit-border-top-left-radius). Besides that, WebKit implements pretty much the CSS3 standard. Rendering looks fine as long as all border widths are equal. If they differ, the rendering looks quite ugly (cf. screen shot). This has already been reported in the WebKit Bugzilla and hopefully is going to be fixed soon.
• Opera: Opera also does not support CSS rounded borders but there is a description online on how to emulate them using SVG backgrounds.
• Internet Explorer: No native support either. I suppose the VML approach presented here works only well in the controlled environment of the qooxdoo widget toolkit, but I may be proved wrong.

It seems that Microsoft's brand new operating system, Windows Vista, introduced at least one interesting, not to say mysterious, phenomenon. It only arises when the user is trying to open a local HTML file with so-called "active content".

After some investigation we found out that it is problematic to open local HTML pages which reference non-existing JavaScript files. During development of qooxdoo applications this could be caused by renaming or moving a class without a re-execute of "make" to re-index the available classes (to regenerate the includer script).

Annoyingly, the displayed error is not very helpful. It just says "Invalid character" in line "0". No hint about security at all. All files are stored on the local file system. No "src" attribute uses another protocol like "http://"or an address of an (external) server. Just simple, relative paths. There seems to be no reason to interpret them the way IE7 under Vista does. The files do not access remote resources. They are not stored in other security zones. We really do not know what Internet Explorer "thinks" in this case.

In all other browsers a non-existing JS file is just ignored. No warning at the error console etc. (Ok, this could be improved here, too).

Please also take a look at the corresponding bug report. Any idea if this is a real IE7/Vista bug?

Update: The problems have been resolved. qooxdoo 0.6.5 was released some minutes ago.

The open-source hosting involved for qooxdoo - Sourceforge currently has some problems with their file release service. Because of this we need to hold up the release of qooxdoo-0.6.5 a bit. Hopefully they will get it done in the next hours. Otherwise we will push out the release ASAP tomorrow. The release is already tagged in SVN, which means that SVN users can update their projects to this tag already. You can monitor this ticket in sourceforge's tracker.