<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: qooxdoo 0.8 Layout Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts</link>
	<description>The qooxdoo news section</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: qooxdoo &#187; News &#187; Rounded borders - and how to do it in IE</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7499</link>
		<dc:creator>qooxdoo &#187; News &#187; Rounded borders - and how to do it in IE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7499</guid>
		<description>[...] 0.8 we will introduce the concept of widget decorators. This has already been described in an earlier blog article. Decorators allow the widget's background to be styled independent of the widget's content. To [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 0.8 we will introduce the concept of widget decorators. This has already been described in an earlier blog article. Decorators allow the widget&#8217;s background to be styled independent of the widget&#8217;s content. To [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Jakobs</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian Jakobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>Hello Jochen,

Thanks for the feedback. The decoration element is optional, so we have two or three DOM elements per widget. This is a bit more than in 0.7 but we can compensate that by using less widgets in general:


&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;
If you wanted to have advanced styling like buttons with borders composed of sprites, you had to create separate image widgets and insert them into the button's layout. Now you can just create a decoration renderer, which comes without the overhead of a complete widget and can use less DOM elements
&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;The layout managers have improved. In places, where we formerly had to use a combination of box layouts, each a separate widget instance, we can now use for example a single grid layout&lt;/li&gt;


&lt;li&gt;Spacer widgets, which are for example used in toolbars, don't have a DOM element. They just allocate the space an equally configured widget would take in the layout.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;



As a conclusion: Yes, new widgets do have more DOM elements but we expect that the overall number of DOM elements will be about the same. On the other hand we expect that the number of widget instances will be lower.

Fabian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jochen,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. The decoration element is optional, so we have two or three DOM elements per widget. This is a bit more than in 0.7 but we can compensate that by using less widgets in general:</p>
<ul>
<li>
If you wanted to have advanced styling like buttons with borders composed of sprites, you had to create separate image widgets and insert them into the button&#8217;s layout. Now you can just create a decoration renderer, which comes without the overhead of a complete widget and can use less DOM elements
</li>
<li>The layout managers have improved. In places, where we formerly had to use a combination of box layouts, each a separate widget instance, we can now use for example a single grid layout</li>
<li>Spacer widgets, which are for example used in toolbars, don&#8217;t have a DOM element. They just allocate the space an equally configured widget would take in the layout.</li>
</ul>
<p>As a conclusion: Yes, new widgets do have more DOM elements but we expect that the overall number of DOM elements will be about the same. On the other hand we expect that the number of widget instances will be lower.</p>
<p>Fabian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen Krause</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen Krause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-layout-concepts#comment-7042</guid>
		<description>Interesting slides! The direction of separating concerns for widgets and layouts looks very good (and familiar ..). Just one question: Does the new structure mean that there will be three divs for every widget, one for widget, decoration and content? How does this compare to 0.7 in terms of overall DOM elements?

Sorry for not using the mailing list ...

Jochen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting slides! The direction of separating concerns for widgets and layouts looks very good (and familiar ..). Just one question: Does the new structure mean that there will be three divs for every widget, one for widget, decoration and content? How does this compare to 0.7 in terms of overall DOM elements?</p>
<p>Sorry for not using the mailing list &#8230;</p>
<p>Jochen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
