<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: qooxdoo 0.8 to support Netscape 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4</link>
	<description>The qooxdoo news section</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alnicodon</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9266</link>
		<dc:creator>Alnicodon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9266</guid>
		<description>Of course I did. And you did mind my faked enthusiastic tone ? ;)

Actually I just happened to get myself an update on qooxdoo from the blog... April Fool's day is long behind now, so wasn't so sceptic and, from what I've learnt so far about qooxdoo, that was "only" stunning, but certainly not unbelievable/impossible.

It's just too bad you did'nt let me make a fool out of myself any longer... I could already foresee the Slashdot headline "Netscape 4 ready for Web 2.0" !

Al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I did. And you did mind my faked enthusiastic tone ? <img src='http://news.qooxdoo.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually I just happened to get myself an update on qooxdoo from the blog&#8230; April Fool&#8217;s day is long behind now, so wasn&#8217;t so sceptic and, from what I&#8217;ve learnt so far about qooxdoo, that was &#8220;only&#8221; stunning, but certainly not unbelievable/impossible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just too bad you did&#8217;nt let me make a fool out of myself any longer&#8230; I could already foresee the Slashdot headline &#8220;Netscape 4 ready for Web 2.0&#8243; !</p>
<p>Al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Herchenröder</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9264</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Herchenröder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9264</guid>
		<description>Um..., Al, you did mind the date of the post, did you?! If you need further proof, take a close look at a blow-up of the "screenshot"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;, Al, you did mind the date of the post, did you?! If you need further proof, take a close look at a blow-up of the &#8220;screenshot&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alnicodon</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Alnicodon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/qooxdoo-08-to-support-netscape-4#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>Stunning  ! I'm stunned ! Stunning and amazing !!!

Ok, I understand that the Ecmascript engine is the basis of the current Firefox/Mofo browsers, the memory leaks (circular garbage and other nuisances) are taken care of by qooxdoo already... but still what I'd really like to know: could you describe what the major incompatibilities you had to care about in order to make all this work ? Many workaround ? Or maybe I'll browse someday through the SVN, after netscape 4 specific variants.

Ah the shock, anyway !

Al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning  ! I&#8217;m stunned ! Stunning and amazing !!!</p>
<p>Ok, I understand that the Ecmascript engine is the basis of the current Firefox/Mofo browsers, the memory leaks (circular garbage and other nuisances) are taken care of by qooxdoo already&#8230; but still what I&#8217;d really like to know: could you describe what the major incompatibilities you had to care about in order to make all this work ? Many workaround ? Or maybe I&#8217;ll browse someday through the SVN, after netscape 4 specific variants.</p>
<p>Ah the shock, anyway !</p>
<p>Al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
