<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari support for qooxdoo coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming</link>
	<description>The qooxdoo news section</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabian</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming#comment-6812</guid>
		<description>If you want to test qooxdoo without using cygwin and make you can just download the precompiled build version. This includes a single qx.js JavaScript file with all qooxdoo classes. For optimized qooxdoo applications howerver it it better to use the SDK builds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to test qooxdoo without using cygwin and make you can just download the precompiled build version. This includes a single qx.js JavaScript file with all qooxdoo classes. For optimized qooxdoo applications howerver it it better to use the SDK builds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Installation</title>
		<link>http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming#comment-6811</link>
		<dc:creator>Installation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.qooxdoo.org/safari-support-for-qooxdoo-coming#comment-6811</guid>
		<description>The resulting output of qooxdoo ajax looks very nice. However, the requirement of installing cygwin, going through make, make source, make whatever, et cetera, takes away from the attractiveness of the framework.

I know that the approach may result in suboptimal download sizes and so on, but would it be possible to have a simplified development method in which developers include one or more javascript files and simply get on with their lives?

That would be highly desirable in order to reduce the learning curve and getting started with the framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The resulting output of qooxdoo ajax looks very nice. However, the requirement of installing cygwin, going through make, make source, make whatever, et cetera, takes away from the attractiveness of the framework.</p>
<p>I know that the approach may result in suboptimal download sizes and so on, but would it be possible to have a simplified development method in which developers include one or more javascript files and simply get on with their lives?</p>
<p>That would be highly desirable in order to reduce the learning curve and getting started with the framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
